Veterans’ Day Remembrance

_______________________

Veterans’ Day was originally celebrated as Armistice Day to commemorate the effective surrender of Imperial Germany which ended World War I in 1918. Although that surrender was for all intents and purposes a victory of the United States forces who arrived barely in time to save France and Britain from collapse, the cease fire date and time – the eleventh hour of the eleventh day of the eleventh month — was at the insistence of French commander Marshal Ferdinand Foch, who conducted the negotiations.

Celebration of the end of that war was made irrelevant by the Second World War, and, after the armistice purporting to end active fighting in the Korean War, a push was made by supporters of American veterans for a national holiday to honor them. Today, after three more significant conflicts, and numerous brushfire actions, and the 45 year Cold War, our veterans, especially those who served actively in harms way, deserve our honor and support.
It is particularly appropriate to honor World War II veterans this year. Because that war ended 56 years ago, there are not many left, and time is running out for them. It was also the last war of active, on the ground combat against significant military powers in which there was a real chance the United States and its allies might not win, a prospect that bode almost certain catastrophe for the world.
One more reason for honoring the WWII vets is that, before technology made war “safer” (yes, I know terribly oxymoronic – but not other word comes to me), those soldiers, sailors, marines, and airmen were asked to charge into the most impossibly dangerous situations knowing that a good many of them would be killed or maimed. And they were. One example of this is the following, most of which I wrote in June two years ago.
The pleasant town of Bayeux in northern France is famous for its eponymous tapestry depicting the events leading to the Norman Conquest of England in 1066. Across from the railway station there is a pub which serves cold beer and the apple cider the region is also famous for. That establishment bears a sign “Welcome to our liberators.” The sign would appear to be incongruous, except that about ten kilometers to the northwest is a bluff overlooking a sandy expanse along the English Channel that for the past six and one-half decades has been known to the world as Omaha Beach.
Many words have been written and spoken on the anniversaries of D-Day and of the Veterans’s Days since. It was the beginning of what General Eisenhower called the “Great Crusade” to end the Nazi occupation of Europe, and ultimately win World War II. Today, the word “crusade” is politically incorrect in some circles as being offensive those who have vowed to kill us and actually have achieved some success in doing so. And we have become accustomed to euphemisms, direct and to the point speech being too harsh for our sensitive ears. That is just as well. The loudest, and most eloquent, statements to be made come from the 10,000 American graves – more than those which have resulted from 10 years in Afghanistan and Iraq – at the top of the cliff and the sound of the waves below.
During a visit to the beach even this long after the fact, it was not difficult to picture the horror and chaos experienced by the soldiers and sailors who stormed ashore that day. The Germans had fortified nearly the entire coastline of France, as well as the coasts of other occupied countries. Various barriers and obstacles had been placed in the water offshore to prevent landing craft from reaching dry land, and to channel invaders into killing zones covered by machine gun bunkers dug into the 100 feet high cliffs above. This required the assault to be made at low tide, leaving a 300 yard completely open expanse of sand to traverse before the slightest natural cover could be reached. Above the high tide line is another 50 yard stretch of loose sand. Walking unencumbered on loose sand can be difficult; running with 60 pounds of weaponry and equipment, all the while facing withering small arms and artillery fire, has to have been a nearly superhuman feat. Many of the invaders did not make it; that so many did is a credit to the quality of the military training and preparation, as well as the fortitude and power of the survival instinct of the troops. The actual film footage in the Normandy episode of the Victory at Sea documentary demonstrated some of the difficulty, but the bloodiest parts had to have been edited to make it suitable for a 1950s home audience. The fictional first 24 minutes of the film Saving Private Ryan might more accurately portray the horror and difficulty of the assault, but still may be an understatement.
It could have been worse. A major part of the plan was to deceive the Germans as to where and when the attack would be made. As previously mentioned, the entire coast-line was fortified. The defending German army was battle-hardened, and exceptionally well-led by Field Marshals Gerd von Runstedt and Erwin Rommel. Their main problem was manpower and munitions. Five years of war, and the continuing demands of the Russian front in the east made critical to the defenders the knowledge of the place and time of the landings. The deception, with some cooperation from the weather, worked. The German defenders were caught off guard at Normandy, and were unable to bring the full weight of their forces to bear until a beachhead was established. Even so, a two-month battle for Normandy followed that was even more costly than the initial landings. Ultimately, the invasion was successful, and Nazi Germany unconditionally surrendered eleven months and two days after D-Day.
The Normandy Invasion was the largest amphibious operation of World War II, and the most decisive success, but it was not the only one. The Allied landings in Italy and Sicily, and the mainly U.S. Marine Corps landings on the Pacific islands of Tarawa, Saipan, Peleliu, Iwo Jima, and Okinawa were proportionately as bloody, though none faced the same magnitude of prepared defenses that Normandy offered. It would have been different had an invasion of the Japanese homeland been necessary. An assault on Japan would have faced an even more determined and fanatical enemy. Planned operations code-named Downfall, Olympic, and Coronet planned for as many as 1.2 million U.S. and Allied casualties.
All that was avoided by the Japanese surrender after Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Use of the atomic bombs undoubtedly spared the American forces, not one, but possibly as many as a half-dozen similar invasions. Armchair moralists might fret about the morality of President Truman’s decision to employ the only nuclear devices ever used in war, but one only has to stand on Omaha Beach and reflect what happened there over years ago, to understand it was the right thing to do.
Omaha Beach

2 comments on “Veterans’ Day Remembrance

  1. Gary Brown says:

    I agree with most of your essay and, as a Vietnam veteran myself, appreciate your comments. But you end on a false note. To quote one of many “armchair moralists,” in this case Walter Goodman in the New York Times:

    “Martin Sherwin, a specialist in nuclear history at Tufts University, says Truman and Byrnes were aware of their alternatives: 'One was to wait for the Soviets to come into the war. One was to modify unconditional surrender. Another alternative was to use the atomic bomb.'

    “Truman's main justification for taking the third course, as shown in excerpts from a 1964 television history of his Presidency, was that it saved '250,000 or 300,000 of our youngsters killed and 700,000 of them maimed.' But that is contradicted tonight on two grounds: military intelligence estimates of American casualties in an invasion were a small fraction of those numbers, and an invasion of the mainland would not have been necessary at all if the Administration had relaxed its demand for unconditional surrender and allowed the Japanese to keep their emperor (as indeed they finally did).

    “It is also noted, contrary to some previous treatments of the subject, that Hiroshima was bombed without warning and that the bomb was aimed not at any military target but at the center of the city.”

    Like

  2. Bob Reagan says:

    Thank you for you comment, Gary. It suggested another essay I wrote several years ago, that I have posted. One might understand the attitude of Sir Arthur “Bomber” Harris: “I do not personally regard the whole of the remaining cities of Germany as worth the bones of one British Grenadier.”

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s