Postal Going

“Neither snow nor rain nor heat nor gloom of night stays these couriers from the swift completion of their appointed rounds” — Herodotus, Histories.
At the corner of Bryan and Ervay Streets in downtown Dallas, there is a five-story, gray stone building occupying the entire northeast block. On three sides, above the second -floor bank of windows the inscription “United States Post Office and Court House” is carved into the stone. This edifice was completed in 1930 to house the regional postal center and main post office for Dallas, as well as the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, and various other federal government agencies. It remained the principal locus of the federal government’s presence in the city until 1971, when a new 16 story behemoth opened at 1100 Commerce Street to reflect the humongous growth of the government and its presence in the everyday lives of citizens in the intervening forty years. Of course, in 1971 we had not seen anything yet.
For the first century and a half of our nation, the Post Office was the only federal agency that average citizen came into frequent contact with. Of the enumerated powers of Congress in Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, the establishment of post offices and designation of post roads is the only one that empowers the lawmakers to provide a direct service to individual citizens. All others powers have been implied – most of the time in Procrustean fashion – by Congress, the Executive, and the Judiciary in the inexorable centralization of power. The Post Office was by far the largest federal civilian activity and employer for most of our history. In major cities, the main post office was where one went if they had any business with our national government.
The inclusion of postal service in the Constitution as an enumerated power seems to have been a national security consideration as well as a means for raising revenue. The debates in the first Congress on the establishment of the Post Office and the office of Postmaster General as well as correspondence between Founders such as John Jay, Washington, and Franklin indicate that was the case. There seems to have been little discussion of the merits during the proceedings of the Constitutional Convention in 1787.
It made sense that the national government should have the facility to provide for the mail at the time. In the late 18th Century, as it had been from time memorial, communication between persons out of sight or hearing had to have been by delivery of writing by couriers of some kind. The Herodotus quote above recognizes the intrepid communication facility of the ancient Persian army as a reason for its success in defeating enemies. Communication among the colonies through Committees of Correspondence, who used the post facilities of the day, was essential for the success of the Revolution.
The post was to become and remain for the principal method of communication for the next two centuries. The electric telegraph in the 1840s was the first development in communication that did not require the communicating parties to be in sight or sound of one another. The telephone, radio, and television, were improvements. But written, or at least durable, communications were desirable and even essential for many purposes. Teletype, FAX, and now the internet, made the that possible, and to the detriment of the postal service.
Now, the United States Postal Service, the quasi-public corporation that succeeded the Post Office Department in 1972 may be facing bankruptcy, and the validity of its continuing existence is seriously questioned. Long time Washington Post pundit Charles Krauthammer on national television last week said categorically that it should be abolished and private entities like UPS and FedEx should take over delivery of the mail. Krauthammer is hardly alone.
The USPS is now mainly a conduit for direct advertising, sending and paying bills, and some business correspondence. When was the last time any of us received a personal letter, other than a birthday, Christmas, or other holiday card?
The United States Postal Service has now become a dinosaur, and an expensive, high-maintenance on at that. It is time to consider privatization, as many other countries have done.

By bobreagan13

My day job is assisting individuals and small businesses as a lawyer. I taught real estate law and American history in the Dallas County Community College system. I have owned and operated private security firms and was a police officer and criminal investigator for the Dallas Police Department.

I am interested in history and historical research, music, cycling, and British mysteries and police dramas.

I welcome comments, positive, negative, or neutral, if they are respectful.

4 replies on “Postal Going”

I hate to quote from my “bible” to support your point of view, but here goes: “For my part, I could easily do without the post-office. I think that there are very few important communications made through it. To speak critically, I never received more than one or two letters in my life — I wrote this some years ago — that were worth the postage. The penny-post is, commonly, an institution through which you seriously offer a man that penny for his thoughts which is so often safely offered in jest.” Well, even Henry David wasn't perfect.

I see serious problems with the private sector taking over all mail services; UPS would, I suppose, do as they do now and toss your mail in the general direction of your residence; delivery would be sketchy at best. And we won't even go into how they block traffic with a fare-thee-well. But I suppose with enough regulations (gasp!), that might work.

Rather, I think the USPS should be generally overhauled, and careful consideration given to its structure.

And I, for one, still send lots of mail. Call me old-fashioned, but I send thank you cards, birthday cards, and even letters.

Your essay glosses over the fact that the U.S. Postal Service is the largest (and stealthiest) Federal jobs program ever. It is the second largest employer of civilians in the U.S. (almost 600,000 jobs). Many of those people enjoy a solid middle-class living, and could probably not get comparable jobs, income, and job security elsewhere. Ask FedEx and UPS to absorb 600,000 jobs.

I assume all those positions were necessary at one time, but that economic times changed faster than the political ability to adapt to them. The USPS should follow the example of American Airlines and use bankruptcy law (or whatever government-entity equivalent is available to them – something TARPish?) to break all their contracts and get a do-over. That's what happens when management makes mistakes they can't correct. Oopsie!

As for the collateral damage to 600,000 Americans? Well, if they were stupid enough to go to work for a dinosaur, that's their problem, right? History is just being its cute, inexorable self. Herodotus didn't say how many couriers to hire, or what quality of living they could expect, did he?

It's painfully clear we need to recruit our nation's youth to take over delivery routes at $3/hr – Future-President Gingrich outlined this at an Iowa speech earlier.
It's a little better than Perry's idea of outsourcing these jobs to “Soylynda” (which he still thinks is a country).

But seriously, I would love to see an 'opt out' of postal service. I can block spam and unsubscribe from email, but I can't stop HEB from sending me circulars.

The solution is a complete overhaul of the system and massive implementation of technology (Spoiler alert: courier jobs are lost). If we gave people the ability to block senders, junk mail is eliminated. On top of that, opt for centralized PO boxes and provide scanning/OCR services for letters. I'll still get a birthday card, but I can read it as a PDF scan or cruise down to my PO box and pick it up if I'd like (within say 2 weeks). After that, it's recycled with the other cards.

I welcome and appreciate all comments, especially from divergent point of view. I actually appreciate hecklers. Several points:

1. The USPS is self-sufficient – for now. The problem is a looming deficit which is the result of the legacy cost of pensions and benefits. Sound familiar? It’s a pervasive problem. The taxpayers will be the ones taking up the slack, along with all of the other funding we do. My suggestion that alternatives be considered pro-actively, not reactively in crisis mode (although we never would not one to go to waste).

2. I didn’t “gloss over” the fact that the USPS employs a lot of workers. I omitted it as irrelevant. “Jobs” are a result of enterprise. Entrepreneurs start businesses (making jobs for themselves), nurture them to success, and create jobs for more people.

3. The USPS has made use of technology, but not to the degree it is available. I understand that some postal entities throughout the world standardize the size for letters to make for more efficient OCR processing. I also understand that the Luddite mentality in the USPS is rather influential because of the union being afraid of losing low skill jobs.

Leave a Reply